<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are religion and science compatible?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesisprocrastination.com/2007/04/11/are-religion-and-science-compatible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesisprocrastination.com/2007/04/11/are-religion-and-science-compatible/</link>
	<description>Sharing my opinons on life, the universe and everything while putting off more worthwhile endeavours.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 04:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://thesisprocrastination.com/2007/04/11/are-religion-and-science-compatible/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesisprocrastination.com/blog/?p=204#comment-661</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right.  And even though it seems strange to me, I guess there&#039;s no reason why someone can&#039;t flip back and forth between the two approaches.   Religious people seem to be good at compartmentalising.

I guess my point is that in this multi-methodological study into the universe,  I don&#039;t think religion is a valid method.  So in that sense, I guess it&#039;s not really in &lt;em&gt;conflict &lt;/em&gt;with science, it doesn&#039;t even belong in the same toolkit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right.  And even though it seems strange to me, I guess there&#8217;s no reason why someone can&#8217;t flip back and forth between the two approaches.   Religious people seem to be good at compartmentalising.</p>
<p>I guess my point is that in this multi-methodological study into the universe,  I don&#8217;t think religion is a valid method.  So in that sense, I guess it&#8217;s not really in <em>conflict </em>with science, it doesn&#8217;t even belong in the same toolkit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://thesisprocrastination.com/2007/04/11/are-religion-and-science-compatible/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesisprocrastination.com/blog/?p=204#comment-660</guid>
		<description>I think what you&#039;ve shown here is that religion and science are &lt;em&gt;not the same&lt;/em&gt;, not that they are incompatible. Consider them to be two approaches in a multi-methodological approach to sense-making that we engage in to make sense of our existence. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what you&#8217;ve shown here is that religion and science are <em>not the same</em>, not that they are incompatible. Consider them to be two approaches in a multi-methodological approach to sense-making that we engage in to make sense of our existence. <img src='http://thesisprocrastination.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
