<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banning gangs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesisprocrastination.com/2008/09/15/banning-gangs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesisprocrastination.com/2008/09/15/banning-gangs/</link>
	<description>Sharing my opinons on life, the universe and everything while putting off more worthwhile endeavours.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 04:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AndrewE</title>
		<link>http://thesisprocrastination.com/2008/09/15/banning-gangs/comment-page-1/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesisprocrastination.com/?p=334#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>Could we get some thoughts from our esteemed Labour colleague?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could we get some thoughts from our esteemed Labour colleague?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://thesisprocrastination.com/2008/09/15/banning-gangs/comment-page-1/#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesisprocrastination.com/?p=334#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>Prior to 9/11 who would have thought the US government would repeal habeas corpus and allow people to be indefinitely detained at Gitmo on purely on suspicion of being an enemy combatant?  I think the way a country loses its freedoms is slowly and gradually and I wouldn&#039;t want to see NZ going there.  And sure, we can eventually slowly give up all our freedoms until we are so repressed we have to overthrow the government in a revolution ... but surely it would be better to just keep them in the first place and not go through all that?

Anyway, I do agree that it seems unlikely for an NZ government in the near future to label a political party as a criminal gang, but I&#039;m still not comfortable with the idea of giving the government the power to decide which groups of people are not allowed to associate with each other.  I&#039;d rather they focus on actual crime.

Having said that, I doubt they will actually do this - I think it&#039;s just political grandstanding to show how tough Labour is on crime before the election.  I don&#039;t think this ban will actually happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior to 9/11 who would have thought the US government would repeal habeas corpus and allow people to be indefinitely detained at Gitmo on purely on suspicion of being an enemy combatant?  I think the way a country loses its freedoms is slowly and gradually and I wouldn&#8217;t want to see NZ going there.  And sure, we can eventually slowly give up all our freedoms until we are so repressed we have to overthrow the government in a revolution &#8230; but surely it would be better to just keep them in the first place and not go through all that?</p>
<p>Anyway, I do agree that it seems unlikely for an NZ government in the near future to label a political party as a criminal gang, but I&#8217;m still not comfortable with the idea of giving the government the power to decide which groups of people are not allowed to associate with each other.  I&#8217;d rather they focus on actual crime.</p>
<p>Having said that, I doubt they will actually do this &#8211; I think it&#8217;s just political grandstanding to show how tough Labour is on crime before the election.  I don&#8217;t think this ban will actually happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://thesisprocrastination.com/2008/09/15/banning-gangs/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesisprocrastination.com/?p=334#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>Scare mongering... Political Parties like the Greens would never be defined a criminal group while as long as they participate in parliament and don&#039;t participate in eco-terrorism etc.

IMHO its better to attempt to control/restrict criminal organisations by what ever means necessary. Should in some unforseeable future NZ become so corrupt that such a law was being used indiscrimanently by some political group, society has way of correcting such imbalances; Revolution... ref: almost every country thats been around for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scare mongering&#8230; Political Parties like the Greens would never be defined a criminal group while as long as they participate in parliament and don&#8217;t participate in eco-terrorism etc.</p>
<p>IMHO its better to attempt to control/restrict criminal organisations by what ever means necessary. Should in some unforseeable future NZ become so corrupt that such a law was being used indiscrimanently by some political group, society has way of correcting such imbalances; Revolution&#8230; ref: almost every country thats been around for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
